“my” against. “mine” for the numerous owner possessive
“We thus delight in you taking my and you will Gregg’s guy to school today.” – but I will suggest “our very own son” or perhaps the kid’s name was natural than just “my and you can Gregg’s son”?
When nudistfriends reviews i go along with Warsaw Will, wouldn’t it remain grammatically proper to use “mine” in this case, if you believe out of “mine” since dealing with “my personal kid”? That’s, what if the original phrase is actually which?:
– Okay, but I think Gregg’s child can come first-in one instance while making clear just what “mine” are making reference to:
Actually, it’s not very clear on modern whether we are speaking throughout the a couple youngsters. If it’s you to definitely, and the presenter nevertheless really wants to discuss one another themself and Gregg, i then imagine “Gregg’s and you can my personal boy” would-be more natural than just “My personal and you may Gregg’s guy”. And in case there have been two – I’d like “Gregg’s and you can my family”, I believe.
Hi porsche, I’m however not yes
– I’m sure it isn’t that which you asked, nevertheless far more I do believe about it, new smaller reasoning I select to refer possibly Gregg otherwise myself; one another understands whoever man try involved. When we expose all of our girl in order to some body I really don’t believe we always say, “This can be Gregg’s and you may my personal child”, but often “This might be the child” or “This might be my girl”. Subsequently, In my opinion we’d become more going to say “my personal guy” or “my personal child” than just “my kid”, wouldn’t i? Or when i said before, just fool around with the identity:
On analogy provided on the amazing question, my personal is right and exploit grammatically impossible – others merely design.
– I agree that that which you state is the solution to brand new original concern, nevertheless the other people isn’t only about build, it’s about sounding pure. I just do not think you to definitely “my personal and you may Gregg’s kid” is actually sheer English. It will not sound to me eg anything a native audio speaker perform say.
Tend to, We trust most which you said, apart from things
Your mentioned that the first phrase is not very obvious. I differ. The type put forth to date provides a very particular meaning:
can simply mean the same thing. A few would say this will be ungrammatical, which have “my” future earliest, however if maybe not ungrammatical, it’s at least noticed rude by all. That it pronoun shift is entirely unacceptable, even yet in informal speech. For people who chat like this, individuals, “educated” or otherwise not, will think you happen to be an earlier adolescent exactly who are unable to establish the cellphone.
also can merely mean Greg features a young child, you really have a new child, and you may people got both students to school. Although this plus matical, it is still impolite. Understand the comment more than on “my”.
Note, evey single one among these sizes is completely unambiguous. Perhaps are typical grammatical, many will be stopped having reasons said.
Past, Usually, the remark about the must talk about Greg is extremely really removed. Especially for instances when Greg and you have a kid with her, it would be unlikely to mention Greg anyway (that makes it even better that “mine” meaans one or two various other kids). Very first, because of the bringing-up Greg, it is no less than implied that he’s not actually introduce. If that is actually happening, why must the guy also be stated? You’d simply state
I entirely concur that all phrases you’ve considering is actually unambiguous, however, they truly are all outcome of all of our translation of your amazing phrase. Ok, because sbee after that requires if it will likely be ‘my’, the guy does inform you, however if i grab the modern phrase because stands without one comment, however still think it is unsure. I thinkl that is what We intended.